|
|
|
| 2009 - Starting 15 May, the "study week" has been organised on behalf of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences by the GM scientist, Ingo Potrykus, the co-inventor of Golden Rice | | Submitted by fedup | 2009-05-13 23:37:30 | NOTE: This can also be found with embedded links at
www.spinwatch.org/-articles-by-category-mainmenu-8/46-gm-industry/5283-spinwatch-condemns-vatican-gm-event-as-a-charade-by-vested-interests
or tiny.cc/PuhjA
---
---
SpinWatch condemns Vatican GM event as a "charade by vested interests"
SpinWatch, 13 May 2009, Immediate release
A meeting on Genetic Modification (GM) being held at the Vatican later this
week[1] has been condemned as "a total farce" by SpinWatch, an independent
non-profit making organisation which monitors the role of PR, propaganda and
lobbying.[2]
Starting 15 May, the "study week" has been organised on behalf of the
Pontifical Academy of Sciences by the GM scientist, Ingo Potrykus, the
co-inventor of Golden Rice.[3] Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo, the Academy's
chancellor, told the Catholic News Service that the aim was to gather "an
objective group of experts" in a search for "scientific clarity" on the
subject.[4]
But the 40 or so participants listed on the academy's website [5] are all GM
supporters, with many well known for their extreme pro-GM views or having
vested interests in GMO adoption.
"This event appears to have been hijacked by the GM lobby. Objectivity is
the last thing anyone should expect from these 'experts'," said Prof. David
Miller of SpinWatch, which has recently launched SpinProfiles, a new online
database which tracks, among others, experts with vested interests or who
spin for industry.[6]
"One of the participants, Eric Sachs is a Monsanto employee,[7] another,
Robert Paarlberg, is an advisor to Monsanto's CEO[8], and Peter Raven and
Roger Beachy head up institutions that have benefited from Monsanto's
corporate largesse to the tune of many millions of dollars.[9] Yet another
speaker, C.S. Prakash, runs the AgBioWorld campaign, which has been used as
a vehicle by Monsanto and its PR people for propaganda attacks on the
company's critics."[10]
"This event is just the kind of charade by vested interests," said Prof.
Miller, "that SpinProfiles was set up to challenge."
According to Claire Robinson, the managing editor of SpinProfiles, some of
the participants are well known for their extreme views. She points, as an
example, to Henry I Miller from the right-wing Hoover Institution.[11] Even
though the US regulatory regime for GMO approvals is generally regarded as
lax[12], Miller has condemned the regulations as excessive.[13]
Robinson said, "Like some of the other contributors to the Vatican event,
Henry I. Miller is a free market fundamentalist. He has even described
Corporate Social Responsibility, which encourages companies to take account
of the social and environmental impact of their actions, as 'a 21st century
Trojan horse designed to destroy free enterprise from within.' According to
Hoover's Miller, right-minded company executives, or 'corporate warriors' as
Miller terms them, 'understand that businesses don't have social
responsibilities'. Their 'legal and moral responsibility', Miller says, is
'to pursue the best interests of their employers - interests that relate
primarily to making as much money as possible'."[14]
Henry I. Miller is also an example of how a number of the speakers at the
Vatican event are linked to lobby groups. Miller is an adjunct scholar at
the Monsanto-backed Competitive Enterprise Institute, which co-founded the
AgBioWorld lobby. He's also a member of the scientific advisory board of the
climate-change denying George C. Marshall Institute, and a director of the
Monsanto-backed American Council on Science and Health.[15]
Another contributor who, according to Robinson, exemplifies the "farcical
extremity of this event" is Andrew Apel, who has been invited to talk about
the funding of organisations which are critical of GMOs.
"Not only is Apel not a scientist or an expert of any kind on the topic he's
speaking on, his only claims to fame seems to be a decade or so spent
editing a newsletter aimed at the biotech industry, and making unfounded and
inflammatory attacks on critics of GM crops. Apel has sought, for instance,
to link scientists critical of GM crops to the 9/11 attackers, claiming soon
after the New York attacks that two women scientists had 'blood' on their
hands!"[16]
"Is this the Pontifical Academy's idea of objectivity?" asked Robinson, who
says it is also noticeable how many of the speakers at an event about
feeding the world are based in North America (the majority) and are male
(all bar two[17]).
Robinson said, "The speakers at the Pontifical Academy event, with their
obsession with GMOs, represent a narrow privileged clique that is firmly
stuck in the past. Their vision is completely at odds with that of the
International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology
for Development (IAASTD), a process involving 400 scientific experts that
was initiated by the World Bank with the co-sponsorship of the United
Nations. The IAASTD, which has already been signed up to by 60 governments,
sees no major role for GM crops in meeting the challenge of hunger and
poverty. It also calls for inclusiveness in directing agricultural research
and development, notably the inclusion of women, who grow most of the food
in the developing world."[18]
The views of the speakers at the Pontifical Academy event are also seriously
at odds with those of Catholic development organisations, as CIDSE - the
international alliance of Catholic development agencies - has made clear in
a letter to Bishop Marcelo Sanchez Sorondo.[19] The concerns of many in the
developing world, including local Churches in Asia, Latin America and
Africa, are also reflected in the working document presented by Pope
Benedict for this fall's Synod of Bishops for Africa.[20] This points out
that using GM crops risks "ruining small landholders, abolishing traditional
methods of seeding and making farmers dependent on the production companies"
selling their GMOs.[21]
"The Vatican needs to listen to the voice of the Church in Africa,"
commented Robinson, "not a narrow clique of hard-core GM extremists, many of
whom have vested interests in the adoption of this dangerous technology."
NOTES
[1]Study Week: Transgenic Plants for Food Security in the Context of
Development, 15-19 May 2009 - Casina Pio IV, The Pontifical Academy, Vatican
City,
www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdscien/2008/booklet_transgenic_09.pdf
Note that the Pontifical Academy of Sciences does not represent the views of
the Vatican or the Pope but attempts have been made to create the impression
that it does. See, for instance, the article: Anna Meldolesi, Vatican Cheers
GM, Nature Biotechnology 27, 214 (2009),
www.nature.com/nbt/journal/v27/n3/full/nbt0309-214a.html
Also available at:
www.agbioworld.org/newsletter_wm/index.php?caseid=archive&newsid=2874
[2] www.spinwatch.org
[3] See the following profile of Ingo Potrykus
www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Ingo_Potrykus
[4] Carol Glatz, Pros and cons of genetic modification: Not your typical
food fight, VATICAN LETTER, Catholic News Service, 1 May 2009,
www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0902003.htm
[5] Study Week: Transgenic Plants for Food Security in the Context of
Development, 15-19 May 2009 - Casina Pio IV, The Pontifical Academy, Vatican
City,
www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdscien/2008/booklet_transgenic_09.pdf
[6] www.spinprofiles.org
[7] Eric Sachs has worked for Monsanto for over 30 years. See, Study Week:
Transgenic Plants for Food Security in the Context of Development, 15-19 May
2009 - Casina Pio IV, The Pontifical Academy, Vatican City, p.18,
www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdscien/2008/booklet_transgenic_09.pdf
[8] See the following profile of Robert Paarlberg
www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Robert_Paarlberg
[9] See the profiles of Peter Raven
www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Peter_Raven
and of Roger Beachy, www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Roger_Beachy
[10] See the profile of CS Prakash
www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Channapatna_S._Prakash
[11] "U.S. regulators rely almost exclusively on information provided by the
biotech crop developer, and those data are not published in journals or
subjected to peer review... The picture that emerges from our study of U.S.
regulation of GM foods is a rubber-stamp 'approval process' designed to
increase public confidence in, but not ensure the safety of, genetically
engineered foods." - Dr David Schubert of the Salk Institute commenting on a
comprehensive, peer-reviewed study of federal regulation of GMOs he
co-conducted, quoted in Brian Tokar, Deficiencies in federal regulatory
oversight of genetically engineered crops, Institute for Social Ecology
Biotechnology Project, June 2006
environmentalcommons.org/RegulatoryDeficiencies.html
See also: www.bangmfood.org/quotes/24-quotes/29-regulatory-breakdown
[12] See the profile of Henry I. Miller
spinprofiles.org/index.php/Henry_I._Miller
[13] See the profile of the Hoover Institution
www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Hoover_Institution
[14] See the profile of Henry I. Miller
spinprofiles.org/index.php/Henry_I._Miller
[15] See the profiles of the Competitive Enterprise Institute
spinprofiles.org/index.php/Competitive_Enterprise_Institute#cite_note-2
George C. Marshall Institute
spinprofiles.org/index.php/George_C._Marshall_Institute
American Council on Science and Health
spinprofiles.org/index.php/American_Council_on_Science_and_Health
[16] See the profile of Andrew Apel
www.spinprofiles.org/index.php/Andrew_Apel
[17] The only female participants appear to be Nina Federoff and Martina
Newell-McGloughlin, according to those listed in Study Week: Transgenic
Plants for Food Security in the Context of Development, 15-19 May 2009 -
Casina Pio IV, The Pontifical Academy, Vatican City
www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_academies/acdscien/2008/booklet_transgenic_09.pdf
[18] International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and
Technology for Development (IAASTD)
www.agassessment.org/
[19] Letter of 27 April 2009, from Bernd Nilles, Secretary General of CIDSE
to Bishop Marcello Sanchez Sorondo. Copy available on request. CIDSE is a
network of 16 major Catholic development organisations with longstanding
experience in the fight against hunger and for food security.
www.cidse.org/aboutus/?id=31
[20] Richard Owen, Multinationals condemned by Pope, The Times, 19 March
2009 www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article5939789.ece
[21] Instrumentum Laboris, African Synod, The Church in Africa in service to
reconciliation, justice and peace, The General Secretariat of the Synod of
Bishops and Libreria Editrice Vaticana
www.zenit.org/article-25422?l=english
|
| | Edit |
|
|
|
